Shocking Opinions

   On one of my earlier post I mentioned a naturalist who was against making efforts to save the Giant Pandas. So I had to do some research and find out who exactly this guy was. I read the interview where he made the comment and all I have to say is that he is entitled to his own opinion even though others (or myself) might not agree with it. The first line that you read about the article tells you exactly what the rest of the article is going to be about. It was very wise to make the first line very controversial so that you want to continue reading and see what has to be said about Chris Packham the naturalist who doesn't favor saving the Giant Pandas. Did I mention that at the beginning of the article there is a picture of a Panda. The picture of the Panda makes it hard to over look the fact that these animals could be gone forever if we let them die out. I would like to make it clear that Packham would like to stop supporting Pandas to support other animals that he feels have a better chance of surviving.
    What I liked about this article was that the statements that were made were backed up with facts. Not only did the author give Packhams statement but there was also evidence showing why he believed what he did. Of course much of the evidence that was provided was against Packham but it still made a very strong argument in favor of the Pandas. We should also consider how there was also the reaction of other naturalist to Packhams statement. The article itself is not large but it does encompass a lot making a point ]that Pandas are naturally slow breeders and this does cause them a lot of trouble when it comes to making their populations numbers grow.
    Like I mentioned earlier we are all entitled to our own opinions even when they may create controversy  We should all fight for what we believe is right.

This was an article by Bryan Nelson "Reputable Naturalist Says We Should Let Pandas Die Out"